Point of View · Field Notes from Forward-Deployed Engineers
What we believe, on the record.
Field notes, working diagrams and patterns from twenty-one programs. Written by the people who shipped them. No vendor framework. No prophecy. No hedging.
We publish three things: field notes from work in flight, boundary diagrams from programs that shipped, and the occasional manifesto when the industry needs one. We do not publish marketing.
36
Pieces published · Last 18 months
Manifesto · 12 min read · Mar 2026
module
Stop calling it an AI project. It's a workflow with a model in it.
Three years of "AI initiative" budgets, two years of "AI strategy" engagements, and the picture is the same in every customer we walk into: pilots that demo and never pass audit. The fix is not another model. It is treating the work as a workflow that happens to have a model in it.
Three series we are publishing
Series · 9 Pieces
Boundary Diagrams
Series · 8 Pieces
Pattern Library
Series · 5 Pieces
The Quarterly POV
Field notes
Patterns we noticed on the way to shipping · 14 pieces
Eval harnesses are not test suites. They are release gates.
Replay-verified parity is what a CFO can sign.
Spot fleets shaped to job classes beat static partitioning every time.
The reviewer is on the loop, not in the way.
Babelfish is the boring win. Take it.
Recent quarterly POVs
Five published · The sixth is in flight
"Agent-ready data" is a sales phrase. Lakehouse-on-Iceberg is the answer.
Why the "AI strategy" engagement is the wrong unit of work.
The forward-deployed engineer is not a staffing model. It is a delivery posture.
Bedrock is not "Amazon's response to OpenAI." It is a substrate.
The Mactores POV —
quarterly, by email.
A long piece every quarter from our engineers. Plus the field notes worth surfacing that month. No webinar invitations. No event funnels. Cancel-by-reply.